You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DisProt in 2022: improved quality and accessibility of protein intrinsic disorder annotation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/nar/gkab1082 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federica Quaglia, Bálint Mészáros, Edoardo Salladini, András Hatos, Rita Pancsa, Lucía B Chemes, Mátyás Pajkos, Tamas Lazar, Samuel Peña-Díaz, Jaime Santos, Veronika Ács, Nazanin Farahi, Erzsébet Fichó, Maria Cristina Aspromonte, Claudio Bassot, Anastasia Chasapi, Norman E Davey, Radoslav Davidović, Laszlo Dobson, Arne Elofsson, Gábor Erdős, Pascale Gaudet, Michelle Giglio, Juliana Glavina, Javier Iserte, Valentín Iglesias, Zsófia Kálmán, Matteo Lambrughi, Emanuela Leonardi, Sonia Longhi, Sandra Macedo-Ribeiro, Emiliano Maiani, Julia Marchetti, Cristina Marino-Buslje, Attila Mészáros, Alexander Miguel Monzon, Giovanni Minervini, Suvarna Nadendla, Juliet F Nilsson, Marian Novotný, Christos A Ouzounis, Nicolás Palopoli, Elena Papaleo, Pedro José Barbosa Pereira, Gabriele Pozzati, Vasilis J Promponas, Jordi Pujols, Alma Carolina Sanchez Rocha, Martin Salas, Luciana Rodriguez Sawicki, Eva Schad, Aditi Shenoy, Tamás Szaniszló, Konstantinos D Tsirigos, Nevena Veljkovic, Gustavo Parisi, Salvador Ventura, Zsuzsanna Dosztányi, Peter Tompa, Silvio C E Tosatto, Damiano Piovesan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Portugal | 1 | 10% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,576,968
of 23,979,422 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#3,054
of 26,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,835
of 519,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#86
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.