↓ Skip to main content

The Nonprofit Starvation Cycle: Does Overhead Spending Really Impact Program Outcomes?

Overview of attention for article published in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 1,264)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
32 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Nonprofit Starvation Cycle: Does Overhead Spending Really Impact Program Outcomes?
Published in
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, November 2021
DOI 10.1177/08997640211057404
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 21%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 10 21%
Social Sciences 7 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 24 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 379. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2026.
All research outputs
#101,766
of 34,043,423 outputs
Outputs from Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
#4
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,519
of 567,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,043,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 567,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.