↓ Skip to main content

Retinal Ganglion Cell Functional Plasticity and Optic Neuropathy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Retinal Ganglion Cell Functional Plasticity and Optic Neuropathy
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology, December 2012
DOI 10.1097/wno.0b013e3182745600
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The clinical management of glaucoma and optic neuropathies has traditionally focused on stages of the diseases at which there are congruent losses of visual function and optic nerve tissue. Increasing clinical and experimental evidence suggests that the electrical activity of retinal ganglion cells, as measured by pattern electroretinogram (PERG), may be altered long before measurable changes in the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer. In addition, PERG alterations in early glaucoma may be either reversed by lowering the intraocular pressure or induced with head-down body posture. Here we apply the well-known concept of neural plasticity to model the reversible/inducible changes of retinal ganglion cell electrical activity during a critical period of dysfunction preceding death. Identification and characterization of this stage of modifiable retinal ganglion cell function represents both a rationale and a target for treatment to change the natural history of the disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Neuroscience 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Computer Science 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
#800
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,412
of 285,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.