↓ Skip to main content

The Future of Agricultural Landscapes, Part III

Overview of attention for book
The Future of Agricultural Landscapes, Part III
Elsevier
Attention for Chapter: Conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe: Looking to the future by learning from the past
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 203)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe: Looking to the future by learning from the past
Book title
The Future of Agricultural Landscapes, Part III
Published in
Advances in Ecological Research, January 2022
DOI 10.1016/bs.aecr.2021.10.005
Book ISBNs
978-0-323-91503-8
Authors

Lécuyer, L., Alard, D., Calla, S., Coolsaet, B., Fickel, T., Heinsoo, K., Henle, K., Herzon, I., Hodgson, I., Quétier, F., McCracken, D., McMahon, B.J., Melts, I., Sands, D., Skrimizea, E., Watt, A., White, R., Young, Juliette, L. Lécuyer, D. Alard, S. Calla, B. Coolsaet, T. Fickel, K. Heinsoo, K. Henle, I. Herzon, I. Hodgson, F. Quétier, D. McCracken, B.J. McMahon, I. Melts, D. Sands, E. Skrimizea, A. Watt, R. White, Juliette Young

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 149 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 70 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 21%
Environmental Science 21 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 77 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2025.
All research outputs
#698,443
of 32,413,349 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Ecological Research
#12
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,951
of 555,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Ecological Research
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,413,349 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 555,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.