↓ Skip to main content

Ecology and the ratchet of events: Climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
453 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
950 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecology and the ratchet of events: Climate variability, niche dimensions, and species distributions
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0901644106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen T. Jackson, Julio L. Betancourt, Robert K. Booth, Stephen T. Gray

Abstract

Climate change in the coming centuries will be characterized by interannual, decadal, and multidecadal fluctuations superimposed on anthropogenic trends. Predicting ecological and biogeographic responses to these changes constitutes an immense challenge for ecologists. Perspectives from climatic and ecological history indicate that responses will be laden with contingencies, resulting from episodic climatic events interacting with demographic and colonization events. This effect is compounded by the dependency of environmental sensitivity upon life-stage for many species. Climate variables often used in empirical niche models may become decoupled from the proximal variables that directly influence individuals and populations. Greater predictive capacity, and more-fundamental ecological and biogeographic understanding, will come from integration of correlational niche modeling with mechanistic niche modeling, dynamic ecological modeling, targeted experiments, and systematic observations of past and present patterns and dynamics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 950 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 39 4%
Brazil 14 1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
France 7 <1%
Switzerland 5 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Czechia 3 <1%
Other 24 3%
Unknown 840 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 231 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 222 23%
Student > Master 120 13%
Student > Bachelor 54 6%
Professor 53 6%
Other 175 18%
Unknown 95 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 446 47%
Environmental Science 254 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 64 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 1%
Engineering 10 1%
Other 30 3%
Unknown 133 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#67,601
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,261
of 184,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#598
of 873 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 873 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.