↓ Skip to main content

High Reproducibility of Tumor Hypoxia Evaluated by 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET for Head and Neck Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High Reproducibility of Tumor Hypoxia Evaluated by 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET for Head and Neck Cancer
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.112.109330
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tumor hypoxia is well known to be radiation resistant. (18)F-fluoromisonidazole ((18)F-FMISO) PET has been used for noninvasive evaluation of hypoxia. Quantitative evaluation of (18)F-FMISO uptake is thus expected to play an important role in the planning of dose escalation radiotherapy. However, the reproducibility of (18)F-FMISO uptake has remained unclarified. We therefore investigated the reproducibility of tumor hypoxia by using quantitative analysis of (18)F-FMISO uptake.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 50%
Physics and Astronomy 12 14%
Engineering 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,178,948
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#3,413
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,328
of 306,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#41
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.