↓ Skip to main content

Availability of iodised table salt in the UK – is it likely to influence population iodine intake?

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Nutrition, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
6 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Availability of iodised table salt in the UK – is it likely to influence population iodine intake?
Published in
Public Health Nutrition, January 2013
DOI 10.1017/s1368980012005496
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Iodine deficiency has recently been found in UK young and pregnant women, which is of concern given the importance of adequate iodine intake in pregnancy for fetal brain development. The WHO recommends that iodine deficiency in a population should be corrected through salt iodisation but there is a lack of UK data on iodised-salt availability, a situation that the present study aimed to address.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 20%
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,818,333
of 34,279,751 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Nutrition
#1,461
of 4,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,996
of 348,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Nutrition
#20
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,279,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.