↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube With Stylet on Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Tracheal Intubation

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
226 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
4 Redditors
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube With Stylet on Successful Intubation on the First Attempt Among Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Tracheal Intubation
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, December 2021
DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.22002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian E. Driver, Matthew W. Semler, Wesley H. Self, Adit A. Ginde, Stacy A. Trent, Sheetal Gandotra, Lane M. Smith, David B. Page, Derek J. Vonderhaar, Jason R. West, Aaron M. Joffe, Steven H. Mitchell, Kevin C. Doerschug, Christopher G. Hughes, Kevin High, Janna S. Landsperger, Karen E. Jackson, Michelle P. Howell, Sarah W. Robison, John P. Gaillard, Micah R. Whitson, Christopher M. Barnes, Andrew J. Latimer, Vikas S. Koppurapu, Bret D. Alvis, Derek W. Russell, Kevin W. Gibbs, Li Wang, Christopher J. Lindsell, David R. Janz, Todd W. Rice, Matthew E. Prekker, Jonathan D. Casey, Christopher S Gray, Andrea Fletcher, Sally Dye, Swati Gulati, Michael C Kurz, Carolynn Lyle, Stephanie Gravitz, Erika LW Rice, Nathaniel D Westphal, Itay Bentov, Jamie Stang, Paige DeVries, Ellen Maruggi, Bradley Lloyd, Anthony T Defebio, Feysel Mohamed, Robert Mitchell, Justin N Oeth, Angela Otoo, Elizabeth A Farmer, Dvonne A Duran, Cori Withers, Jennifer Friedel, Karina M Nava, Anna Altz-Stamm, Cristina Bardita, Mary C Boone, Joe W Chiles, Kristina Collins, Abby Drescher, Kevin G Dsouza, Janna Dunn, Stacy Ejem, Josh Gautney, Nicole Harris, Savannah Herder, Tamer Hudali, R. Chad Wade, Rutwij Joshi, Daniel Kelmenson, Anne M Mason, Scott R Merriman, Takudzwa Mkorombindo, Megan Moore, Jada Nowak, Kate O’Connor, Sheylan D Patel, G. Bruno Pereira, Lisa Sarratt, Tabitha Stewart, William S Stigler, Kadambari Vijaykumar, Gina White, Stephanie C Demasi, Laura E Goyack, Kristy K Ford, Trevor S Mattox, Taketo Watase, Layla Anderson, Alicia K Cupelo, Aaron J Lacey

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 226 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 11%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Student > Master 11 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 109 53%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Neuroscience 2 <1%
Chemistry 2 <1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 115 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2026.
All research outputs
#239,493
of 34,819,312 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#3,169
of 43,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,828
of 569,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#71
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,819,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 569,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.