↓ Skip to main content

PLANNING OF A COMMUNITY‐BASED APPROACH TO INJURY CONTROL AND SAFETY PROMOTION IN A RURAL COMMUNITY

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Rural Health, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
PLANNING OF A COMMUNITY‐BASED APPROACH TO INJURY CONTROL AND SAFETY PROMOTION IN A RURAL COMMUNITY
Published in
Australian Journal of Rural Health, December 2001
DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1584.2001.00399.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper describes the planning of a community-based approach to injury control and safety promotion, the Kolan Injury Prevention Program. The process involved the establishment of a local steering committee, 11 months of injury surveillance, a critical review of the evidence base, community consultations and assessment of community resources. There were 412 recorded injury cases during the surveillance period, with higher rates among men, manual workers, those aged 15-34 years, sport/leisure activities and around the home and farm. Salient issues for residents included a lack of access to safety information and skills, particularly with regard to first aid and bush fire for isolated residents and rurally inexperienced new residents. While injury prevention was identified as an important issue for the community, the rapidly changing size and nature of the community and its infrastructure made this a particularly challenging issue. Challenges included limited availability of volunteers from key sectors, lack of formal data collection systems, difficulties in mobilising support for a broad issue like injury, limited communication networks and the negative impact of distance and role uncertainty on community ownership of the program. This case study illustrates the steps involved in an effective community-based needs assessment addressing injury prevention. Such an approach, if carried out systematically, will help ensure that the strategies and programs developed will be both appropriate and likely to obtain the support of the local community.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 14 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Sports and Recreations 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 22 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2008.
All research outputs
#8,978,899
of 26,544,284 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#309
of 829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,092
of 133,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.