↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Social capital and the problem of opportunistic leadership: the example of Koreans in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Law and Economics, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction to: Social capital and the problem of opportunistic leadership: the example of Koreans in Japan
Published in
European Journal of Law and Economics, December 2021
DOI 10.1007/s10657-021-09718-1
Authors

J. Mark Ramseyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,691,910
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Law and Economics
#153
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,501
of 509,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Law and Economics
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.