↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacology of Milrinone in Neonates With Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn and Suboptimal Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide*

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pharmacology of Milrinone in Neonates With Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn and Suboptimal Response to Inhaled Nitric Oxide*
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0b013e31824ea2cd
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn is a common problem with significant morbidity and mortality. Inhaled nitric oxide is the standard care, but up to 40% of neonates are nonresponders. Milrinone is a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor which increases the bioavailability of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and has been shown to improve pulmonary hemodynamics in animal experimental models. The primary objective was to investigate the pharmacological profile of milrinone in persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn. Secondary objectives were to delineate short-term outcomes and safety profile.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 145 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 18%
Other 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 39 26%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 41 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#8,074,272
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#2,068
of 4,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,799
of 299,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.