↓ Skip to main content

食品の嗜好性·加工性の改善と健康増進機能の向上に関する研究(平成28年度日本食品科学工学会学会賞)

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
食品の嗜好性·加工性の改善と健康増進機能の向上に関する研究(平成28年度日本食品科学工学会学会賞)
Published in
Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi, January 2018
DOI 10.3136/nskkk.65.1
Authors

熊谷(佐瀬) 日登美

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#449
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,801
of 452,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kaishi
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.