↓ Skip to main content

Changes in Bone Regeneration by Trehalose Coating and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor after Implantation of Tailor-Made Bone Implants in Dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in Bone Regeneration by Trehalose Coating and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor after Implantation of Tailor-Made Bone Implants in Dogs
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2013
DOI 10.1292/jvms.12-0244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sungjin CHOI, Jongil LEE, Kazuyo IGAWA, I-Li LIU, Muneki HONNAMI, Shigeki SUZUKI, Ryohei NISHIMURA, Ung-Il CHUNG, Nobuo SASAKI, Manabu MOCHIZUKI

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of trehalose coating and the optimal dose of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), an osteoinductive protein, loaded onto tailor-made bone implants for implant-induced bone formation in vivo. We fabricated tailor-made α-tricalcium phosphate bone implants (11 mm diameter with 2 parallel cylindrical holes). bFGF 0, 1, 10, 100 or 200 μg/implant was incorporated into implants with and without a trehalose coating, and these were subsequently implanted into dogs to correct temporal bone defects of the same size and shape. Four weeks after implantation, we analyzed the bone implants and surrounding tissues by using micro-computed tomography imaging and histological analyses, as well as gross evaluation. No significant difference in new bone formation was observed between implants with and without a trehalose coating at any of the bFGF doses. Bone implants with 100 and 200 μg bFGF showed significantly more new bone formation at the implant site and within the cylindrical holes of the implants than those without bFGF (P<0.05). However, heterotopic bone formation on the skull near the implant was observed in the group that received 200 μg bFGF. These results suggest that 100 μg bFGF is the optimal dose for this implant in dogs, and that the trehalose coating may not be necessary in vivo, probably due to the presence of blood proteins and electrolytes at the implant site.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 28%
Student > Master 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#2,042
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,258
of 287,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#16
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.