↓ Skip to main content

Pulsus Alternans in Cardiogenic Shock Recapitulated in Single Cell Fluorescence Imaging of a Patient’s Cardiomyocyte

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Heart Failure, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pulsus Alternans in Cardiogenic Shock Recapitulated in Single Cell Fluorescence Imaging of a Patient’s Cardiomyocyte
Published in
Circulation: Heart Failure, December 2021
DOI 10.1161/circheartfailure.121.008855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#21,666,999
of 27,407,869 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Heart Failure
#1,530
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,954
of 533,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Heart Failure
#43
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,407,869 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.