↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of previous surgery on sentinel lymph node mapping: Hybrid SPECT/CT before and after a unilateral diagnostic breast excision
Published in
The Breast, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.breast.2016.08.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Earlier studies have shown conflicting results regarding the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous breast surgery, especially after a surgical biopsy. To compare lymph drainage patterns before and after a diagnostic unilateral surgical biopsy using the exact anatomical localisation of sentinel lymph nodes defined by SPECT/CT. Thirty-seven women planned for unilateral surgical excision of an unsuspicious breast lesion were prospectively examined between September 2011 and January 2015. Hybrid SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy of the thorax and neck region with bilateral subareolar injections of (99m)Tc-Nanocoll was performed one week before and six weeks after surgery. The non-operated side served as a control. The primary outcome measure was the concordance between pre- and postoperative number and localisation of sentinel lymph nodes. Sentinel lymph node detection rate with SPECT/CT on operated sides was 91.9 per cent (34 of 37 procedures), to be compared with a detection rate of 93.7 per cent on all non-operated sides (104 of 111 procedures, P = 0.771). Partial or total concordance regarding the localisation and number of sentinel lymph nodes was 85.7 per cent (30 out of 35) on operated and 88.9 per cent (32 out of 36 patients) on non-operated breast sides (P = 0.735). Breast surgery slightly decreased the concordance between pre- and postoperative sentinel lymph nodes, but this finding was not statistically significant. Our results thus support that it is feasible to perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy after previous breast excisional surgery with an acceptable level of safety.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Engineering 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Breast
#1,213
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,195
of 347,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Breast
#44
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.