| Title |
Adults with intellectual disabilities and mental health disorders in primary care: A scoping review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0164 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katrien PM Pouls, Monique CJ Koks-Leensen, Mathilde Mastebroek, Geraline L Leusink, Willem JJ Assendelft |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 45% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,273,449
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,101
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,599
of 430,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#30
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.