↓ Skip to main content

Estimating consensus and associated uncertainty between inherently different species distribution models

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimating consensus and associated uncertainty between inherently different species distribution models
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2013
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12032
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
France 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 132 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 19 12%
Other 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 62 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Mathematics 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 16 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,824,692
of 27,557,847 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#2,129
of 2,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,075
of 210,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,557,847 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.