You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A plea for a worldwide development of dark infrastructure for biodiversity – Practical examples and ways to go forward
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape & Urban Planning, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104332 |
| Authors |
Romain Sordello, Samuel Busson, Jérémie H. Cornuau, Philippe Deverchère, Baptiste Faure, Adrien Guetté, Franz Hölker, Christian Kerbiriou, Thierry Lengagne, Isabelle Le Viol, Travis Longcore, Pascal Moeschler, Jessica Ranzoni, Nicolas Ray, Yorick Reyjol, Yoann Roulet, Sibylle Schroer, Jean Secondi, Nicolas Valet, Sylvie Vanpeene, Sébastien Vauclair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| France | 6 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 72% |
| Scientists | 18 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 23% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 182. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#223,513
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#18
of 2,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,904
of 451,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.