↓ Skip to main content

A Subset of Neutrophils Expressing Markers of Antigen-Presenting Cells in Human Visceral Leishmaniasis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Subset of Neutrophils Expressing Markers of Antigen-Presenting Cells in Human Visceral Leishmaniasis
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, September 2016
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jiw394
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

 Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a potentially fatal parasitic disease associated with fever, cachexia and impaired protective T cell responses against the parasite.  Peripheral blood leukocytes from 105 subjects with VL and healthy control subjects from the endemic region of Muzaffarpur, Bihar, India were compared using flow cytometry and RT-qPCR. Findings were correlated with clinical data.  An expanded population of low density neutrophils that expressed HLA-DR, CD80 and CD86 was observed in subjects with VL. This neutrophil population contracted after successful treatment of disease. Plasma from patients with acute VL was able to induce similar high-level HLA-DR expression in neutrophils from healthy subjects. HLA-DR positive neutrophils of VL subjects did not uniquely stimulate T cell proliferation, but they did express higher PDL1 than other neutrophils, and lymphocytes of the same subjects expressed high surface PD1.  Patients with acute VL have expanded circulating low-density neutrophils expressing markers of antigen presentation, which diminish after treatment. Development of HLA-DR+ neutrophils is stimulated, at least in part, by components of plasma from patients with acute disease. Although we found no evidence they act as antigen presenting cells, these neutrophils expressed markers implicating a role in T cell exhaustion.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 12 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#31,186,734
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#18,373
of 18,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,407
of 336,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#125
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.