Background: Our goal was to investigate patients' upper extremity tissue perfusion changes using an indocyanine green laser angiography imaging system for various pathologic states and interventions. Methods: This prospective observational study used Spy Elite/LUNA laser angiography to evaluate perfusion in patients with upper extremity vascular compromise. All patients had Spy Elite/LUNA imaging as well as clinical and handheld Doppler examinations preintervention, intraoperatively, if applicable, and at 1 week, 2 weeks, and 2 months postintervention. For each laser angiography scan, we used an unaffected control area with uninjured skin to quantitatively compare with the dysvascular tissues. Results: Twelve patients, 7 men and 5 women, had a total of 16 upper extremities evaluated. The mean age was 53 years, and half of the patients entering the study were smokers. Etiologies of vascular compromise were trauma, primary and secondary vasospastic disease, scleroderma, and intravascular drug injection. Interventions included surgical repair/reconstruction, botulinum toxin injections, and/or systemic medications. Improvement in perfusion following intervention was statistically significant, demonstrated by an increase in Spy Elite/LUNA quantitative score postintervention compared with preintervention scans. Adjusting for other variables, such as smoking and handheld Doppler signal status, demonstrated an independent statistically significant increase in Spy Elite/LUNA scores at all postintervention time points compared with preintervention scores. Laser angiography was able to confirm adequate vascular status, with ultimate tissue survival, in some cases when Doppler signals were not initially present. Conclusions: Laser angiography provided objective data to document improved upper extremity tissue perfusion following various interventions.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#18,534,908
of 27,712,151 outputs
Outputs from HAND
#341
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,253
of 367,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HAND
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,712,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
