↓ Skip to main content

Observation of Persistent Flow of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Toroidal Trap

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Observation of Persistent Flow of a Bose-Einstein Condensate in a Toroidal Trap
Published in
Physical Review Letters, December 2007
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.99.260401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
France 4 2%
Spain 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 147 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 28%
Researcher 43 27%
Student > Master 13 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 133 82%
Mathematics 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Chemistry 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 18 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,735,657
of 28,805,922 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#9,997
of 43,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,360
of 186,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#27
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,805,922 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.