↓ Skip to main content

Taking a holistic approach to managing difficult stress fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 1,854)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Taking a holistic approach to managing difficult stress fractures
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0431-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stress fractures and other bony stress injuries occur along a spectrum of severity which can impact treatment and prognosis. When treating these injuries, it should be borne in mind that no two stress fractures behave exactly alike. Given that they are not a consistent injury, standardized treatment protocols can be challenging to develop. Treatment should be individualized to the patient or athlete, the causative activity, the anatomical site, and the severity of the injury. A holistic approach to the treatment of the most difficult stress fractures should be taken by orthopedists and sports medicine specialists. This approach is necessary to obtain optimal outcomes, minimize loss of fitness and time away from sports participation, and decrease the risk of recurrence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 51 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Sports and Recreations 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 52 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2025.
All research outputs
#670,552
of 28,961,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#14
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,048
of 316,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,961,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.