↓ Skip to main content

Maternal immune activation alters sensitivity to action-outcome contingency in adult rat offspring

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, Behavior & Immunity, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Maternal immune activation alters sensitivity to action-outcome contingency in adult rat offspring
Published in
Brain, Behavior & Immunity, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.08.020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Epidemiological studies have provided convincing evidence for a role of maternal immune activation in the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism and schizophrenia. In recent years, several research groups have capitalised on this discovery and developed animal models such as the maternal immune activation (MIA) model that emulates many phenotypes characteristic of disorders such as schizophrenia. In the present series of experiments we used the MIA model to examine motivation, a core component of the negative symptomology in schizophrenia. Contrary to what we expected, in the progressive ratio task which assesses an animals' willingness to work for a reward under increasing effort requirements we found that MIA rats appeared more motivated than controls. Subsequent tests showed that this seemingly enhanced motivation was not due to an overall increase in responding, nor due to enhanced attribution of incentive salience to reward associated responses. Instead, we found that the increased willingness to work exhibited by MIA animals was due to an inability to detect changes in the contingency between their behaviour and the resulting rewarding outcome. With regard to motivation, the experiments reported here are the first to subject the MIA model to a rigorous experimental analysis of behaviour by parsing apart underlying processes that give rise to the overt symptoms in psychiatric disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 21%
Psychology 13 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#31,180,890
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Brain, Behavior & Immunity
#3,892
of 4,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,292
of 337,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain, Behavior & Immunity
#79
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.