You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toxicity and bioaccumulation of Cadmium, Copper and Zinc in a direct comparison at equitoxic concentrations in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) juveniles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0220485 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vyshal Delahaut, Božidar Rašković, Marta Satorres Salvado, Lieven Bervoets, Ronny Blust, Gudrun De Boeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,987,449
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#82,732
of 195,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,931
of 372,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,145
of 2,753 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,753 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.