↓ Skip to main content

HESS Opinions: Repeatable research: what hydrologists can learn from the Duke cancer research scandal

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HESS Opinions: Repeatable research: what hydrologists can learn from the Duke cancer research scandal
Published in
Hydrology & Earth System Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.5194/hess-20-3739-2016
Authors

Michael N. Fienen, Mark Bakker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
Belgium 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 6 16%
Other 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 54%
Engineering 6 16%
Environmental Science 5 14%
Computer Science 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Hydrology & Earth System Sciences
#1,271
of 3,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,224
of 331,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrology & Earth System Sciences
#28
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.