↓ Skip to main content

Democracy Under Uncertainty: The Wisdom of Crowds and the Free-Rider Problem in Group Decision Making

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Review, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Democracy Under Uncertainty: The Wisdom of Crowds and the Free-Rider Problem in Group Decision Making
Published in
Psychological Review, January 2011
DOI 10.1037/a0020699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Sweden 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 204 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Student > Master 36 16%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Professor 18 8%
Other 57 25%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 91 40%
Social Sciences 25 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 26 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2018.
All research outputs
#15,290,154
of 26,154,612 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Review
#1,299
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,355
of 194,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Review
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.