↓ Skip to main content

Simulations studies for the Mini-EUSO detector

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Simulations studies for the Mini-EUSO detector
Published in
arXiv, July 2021
DOI 10.22323/1.395.0334
Authors

Francesco Fenu, H. Miyamoto, F. Fenu, D. Barghini, M. Battisti, A. Belov, F. Bisconti, R. Bonino, G. Cambiè, F. Capel, M. Casolino, I. Churilo, T. Ebisuzaki, C. Fuglesang, A. Golzio, P. Gorodetzky, F. Kajino, P. Klimov, M. Manfrin, W. Marszal, M. Mignone, E. Parizot, P. Picozza, L.W. Piotrowski, Z. Plebaniak, G. Prevôt, E. Reali, Marco Ricci, N. Sakaki, K. Shinozaki, G. Suino, J. Szabelski, Y. Takizawa, Hiroko MIYAMOTO, Dario Barghini, Matteo Battisti, Alexander S. Belov, Mario E. Bertaina, Francesca Bisconti, Raffaella Bonino, Giorgio Cambiè, Francesca Capel, Marco Casolino, Igor Churilo, Toshikazu Ebisuzaki, Christer Fugelsang, Alessio Golzio, Philippe Gorodetzky, Fumiyoshi Kajino, Pavel Klimov, Massimo Manfrin, Laura Marcelli, Wlodzimierz Marszal, Marco Mignone, Etienne Parizot, Piergiorgio Picozza, Lech Piotrowski, Zbigniew Dariusz Plebaniak, Guillaume Prévôt, Enzo Reali, Naoto Sakaki, Kenji Shinozaki, Gregorio Suino, Jacek Szabelski, Yoshiyuki Takizawa

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#5,364,738
of 28,731,329 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#94,391
of 1,179,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,273
of 450,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#2,131
of 25,217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,731,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,179,163 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25,217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.