You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nutrient identity modifies the destabilising effects of eutrophication in grasslands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology Letters, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.1111/ele.13946 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Oliver Carroll, Evan Batzer, Siddharth Bharath, Elizabeth T. Borer, Sofía Campana, Ellen Esch, Yann Hautier, Timothy Ohlert, Eric W. Seabloom, Peter B. Adler, Jonathan D. Bakker, Lori Biederman, Miguel N. Bugalho, Maria Caldeira, Qingqing Chen, Kendi F. Davies, Philip A. Fay, Johannes M. H. Knops, Kimberly Komatsu, Jason P. Martina, Kevin S. McCann, Joslin L. Moore, John W. Morgan, Taofeek O. Muraina, Brooke Osborne, Anita C. Risch, Carly Stevens, Peter A. Wilfahrt, Laura Yahdjian, Andrew S. MacDougall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 30% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
France | 1 | 5% |
Singapore | 1 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Argentina | 1 | 5% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
Scientists | 6 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 26% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,115,226
of 24,171,551 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#1,246
of 3,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,746
of 506,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#37
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 506,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.