↓ Skip to main content

The Hourglass Is Half Full or Half Empty: Temporal Framing and the Group Planning Fallacy

Overview of attention for article published in Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice , September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 402)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Hourglass Is Half Full or Half Empty: Temporal Framing and the Group Planning Fallacy
Published in
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice , September 2005
DOI 10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.173
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
China 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 22%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2026.
All research outputs
#4,192,336
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice
#35
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,045
of 100,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them