↓ Skip to main content

Membraneless microfluidic microbial fuel cell for rapid detection of electrochemical activity of microorganism

Overview of attention for article published in Bioresource Technology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Membraneless microfluidic microbial fuel cell for rapid detection of electrochemical activity of microorganism
Published in
Bioresource Technology, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hsiang-Yu Wang, Jian-Yu Su

Abstract

A membraneless microfluidic microbial fuel cell (μMFC) for rapid detection of microorganism electroactivity is demonstrated in this study. Owing to the merit of laminar flow, the proposed μMFC has well-separated anode and cathode without applying proton exchange membrane. The highest open circuit voltages (OCVs) produced by different anodal solutions: fresh medium, inactivated and untreated microflora, were 102, 131, and 246 mV, respectively. These results show that the membraneless μMFC is capable of identifying the electric potential resulting from the imbalanced compositions between two streams (29 mV) and from the electrochemical activity of microflora (115 mV). When samples obtained along a batch cycle of H-type MFC were tested, the membraneless μMFC produced similar OCVs with those from the H-type MFC. In conclusion, the proposed μMFC has comparable abilities in detecting electroactivity with the conventional H-type MFC; moreover, it can distinguish the source of collected electricity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
India 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 76 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Student > Master 14 17%
Researcher 11 14%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Chemistry 8 10%
Chemical Engineering 5 6%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2013.
All research outputs
#16,131,422
of 26,860,676 outputs
Outputs from Bioresource Technology
#5,025
of 8,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,919
of 294,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresource Technology
#86
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,860,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.