↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab 150 mg Every 4 Weeks in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not on Statin Therapy: The ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab 150 mg Every 4 Weeks in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not on Statin Therapy: The ODYSSEY CHOICE II Study
Published in
Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, September 2016
DOI 10.1161/jaha.116.003421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Stroes, John R. Guyton, Norman Lepor, Fernando Civeira, Daniel Gaudet, Gerald F. Watts, Marie T. Baccara‐Dinet, Guillaume Lecorps, Garen Manvelian, Michel Farnier, the ODYSSEY CHOICE II Investigators, K. Kostner, S. Lehman, O. Descamps, L. Gheyle, C. Mathieu, J. Bergeron, T. Elliott, G. Girard, A. Gupta, G. Hoag, J. Hove, J. Jeppesen, J.H. Kjærulf, K. Klarlund, K.K. Thomsen, D.C.G. Basart, A. Kooy, A. Liem, H. Swart, R. Troquay, J Van Het Hof‐Wiersma, P. Viergever, F. Visseren, R.N. Doughty, R. Scott, C. Calvo, J.L. Díaz‐Díaz, F. Fuentes, B. Gil‐Extremera, C. Jericó, L. Matas Pericas, J.D. Mediavilla Garcia, D.E. Bolster, M. Koren, M. El Shahawy, G. Vardi, D. Weinstein, K. Zuzarte, Henry Ginsberg, Jennifer G. Robinson, Daniel J. Rader, Christopher P. Cannon, Helen Colhoun, John J.P. Kastelein, Yong Huo, Anders Olsson, David Waters, Dominique Larrey, Robert S. Rosenson, Peter A. Patriarca, Geert Molenberghs, Pierluigi Tricoci, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Renato D. Lopes, Bimal R. Shah, Rajendra H. Mehta, Matthew T. Roe, Zubin Eapen, Luciana Armaganijan, Adriana Bertolami, Sergio Leonardi, Bradley J. Kolls, J. Dedrick Jordan, Grégory Ducrocq, Etienne Puymirat, Robin Mathews

Abstract

The PCSK9 antibody alirocumab (75 mg every 2 weeks; Q2W) as monotherapy reduced low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by 47%. Because the option of a monthly dosing regimen is convenient, ODYSSEY CHOICE II evaluated alirocumab 150 mg Q4W in patients with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolemia and not on statin (majority with statin-associated muscle symptoms), receiving treatment with fenofibrate, ezetimibe, or diet alone. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo, alirocumab 150 mg Q4W or 75 mg Q2W (calibrator arm), with dose adjustment to 150 mg Q2W at week (W) 12 if W8 predefined LDL-C target levels were not met. The primary efficacy endpoint was LDL-C percentage change from baseline to W24. Mean baseline LDL-C levels were 163.9 mg/dL (alirocumab 150 mg Q4W, n=59), 154.5 mg/dL (alirocumab 75 mg Q2W, n=116), and 158.5 mg/dL (placebo, n=58). In the alirocumab 150 mg Q4W and 75 mg Q2W groups (49.1% and 36.0% of patients received dose adjustment, respectively), least-squares mean LDL-C changes from baseline to W24 were -51.7% and -53.5%, respectively (placebo [+4.7%]; both groups P<0.0001 versus placebo). In total, 63.9% and 70.3% of alirocumab-treated patients achieved their LDL-C targets at W24. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 77.6% (alirocumab 150 mg Q4W), 73.0% (alirocumab 75 mg Q2W), and 63.8% (placebo) of patients, with injection-site reactions among the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W can be considered in patients not on statin with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolemia as a convenient option for lowering LDL-C. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02023879.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Researcher 17 10%
Other 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 62 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 71 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2024.
All research outputs
#6,364,979
of 34,281,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#4,258
of 10,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,688
of 334,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#49
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,281,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.