↓ Skip to main content

Living with sub‐optimal glycaemic control: the experiences of Type 2 diabetes diagnosis and education

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Living with sub‐optimal glycaemic control: the experiences of Type 2 diabetes diagnosis and education
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, September 2016
DOI 10.1111/jan.13145
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To explore the experiences of diagnosis and education for people living with Type 2 diabetes who have sub-optimal glycemic control. The increasing prevalence of Type 2 diabetes is a global concern. Many people have difficulty maintaining optimal glycemic control with up to 50% having HbA1c levels higher than recommended. A range of factors have been suggested as possibly contributing to this, however, little is known about how their experience of diagnosis, education and support to attempt to understand the context of their self-management practices. A qualitative thematic analysis of interviews conducted with people with sub-optimal glycemic control prior to their participation in an intervention study. Thirty participants taking part in a psychosocial/educational intervention for people with sub-optimal glycemic control were interviewed in 2012 before the intervention commenced. These interviews explored each participant's experience of the diagnosis and associated education. The interviews were transcribed and a thematic analysis was conducted. Almost all the participants had been shocked at receiving the diagnosis and felt it had been a moral indictment on their lifestyle. Many had been given the impression that they had a mild form of diabetes and most had been given very little information on self-management that they had found useful. The findings suggest that for the participants there was a considerable gap between the rhetoric of person-centered services and the reality of the experiences of diagnosis and education for the self-management of Type 2 diabetes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 31%
Lecturer 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Computer Science 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2017.
All research outputs
#16,587,422
of 27,623,513 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#4,355
of 6,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,460
of 314,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#82
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,623,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.