↓ Skip to main content

[An Adult Case of Enterovirus D68 Encephalomyelitis Presenting as Bilateral Facial Nerve Palsy and Dysphagia].

Overview of attention for article published in Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[An Adult Case of Enterovirus D68 Encephalomyelitis Presenting as Bilateral Facial Nerve Palsy and Dysphagia].
Published in
Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo, August 2017
DOI 10.11477/mf.1416200848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuta Kusabe, Akari Takeshima, Azusa Seino, Mana Nishida, Mami Takahashi, Shota Yamada, Junsuke Shimbo, Aki Sato, Kouichirou Okamoto, Shuichi Igarashi

Abstract

A 33-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with bilateral facial nerve paralysis, dysphagia, and muscle weakness in the neck and trunk following fever, headache and throat pain. T<sub>2</sub>-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed hyperintense lesions in the tegmentum of the brain stem and the ventral region of the superior cervical cord. Based on the characteristic findings on the brain MRI, we diagnosed the patient with enteroviral encephalomyelitis. Steroid therapy was administered; however, his bilateral facial nerve paralysis and dysphagia were refractory to this therapy. Subsequently, enterovirus D68 was detected in the serum using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. At that time, an outbreak of enteroviral D68 infection was reported in Japan. Finally, we diagnosed encephalomyelitis caused by enteroviral D68 infection. Characteristic MRI findings were very useful in narrowing down the differential diagnosis in this patient. (Received March 3, 2017; Accepted April 20, 2017; Published August 1, 2017).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Other 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,050,597
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo
#128
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,413
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain and nerve Shinkei kenkyū no shinpo
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them