↓ Skip to main content

LongITools: Dynamic longitudinal exposome trajectories in cardiovascular and metabolic noncommunicable diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Epidemiology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
LongITools: Dynamic longitudinal exposome trajectories in cardiovascular and metabolic noncommunicable diseases
Published in
Environmental Epidemiology, December 2021
DOI 10.1097/ee9.0000000000000184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justiina Ronkainen, Rozenn Nedelec, Angelica Atehortua, Zhanna Balkhiyarova, Anna Cascarano, Vien Ngoc Dang, Ahmed Elhakeem, Esther van Enckevort, Ana Goncalves Soares, Sido Haakma, Miia Halonen, Katharina F. Heil, Anni Heiskala, Eleanor Hyde, Bénédicte Jacquemin, Elina Keikkala, Jules Kerckhoffs, Anton Klåvus, Joanna A. Kopinska, Johanna Lepeule, Francesca Marazzi, Irina Motoc, Mari Näätänen, Anton Ribbenstedt, Amanda Rundblad, Otto Savolainen, Valentina Simonetti, Nina de Toro Eadie, Evangelia Tzala, Anna Ulrich, Thomas Wright, Iman Zarei, Enrico d’Amico, Federico Belotti, Carl Brunius, Christopher Castleton, Marie-Aline Charles, Romy Gaillard, Kati Hanhineva, Gerard Hoek, Kirsten B. Holven, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Marika A. Kaakinen, Eero Kajantie, Maryam Kavousi, Timo Lakka, Jason Matthews, Andrea Piano Mortari, Marja Vääräsmäki, Trudy Voortman, Claire Webster, Marie Zins, Vincenzo Atella, Maria Bulgheroni, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Gabriella Conti, Jayne Evans, Janine F. Felix, Barbara Heude, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Marjukka Kolehmainen, Rikard Landberg, Karim Lekadir, Stefano Parusso, Inga Prokopenko, Susanne R. de Rooij, Tessa Roseboom, Morris Swertz, Nicholas Timpson, Stine M. Ulven, Roel Vermeulen, Teija Juola, Sylvain Sebert, Sylvain Sebert, Teija Juola, Rozenn Nedelec, Justiina Ronkainen, Anni Heiskala, Miia Halonen, Yiyan He, Jouko Miettunen, Ville Karhunen, Eero Kajantie, Marja Vääräsmäki, Elina Keikkala, Pia Nyberg, Raisa Serpi, Janine Felix, Vincent Jaddoe, Irene Marques, Susana Moreira da Silva Santos, Maryam Kavousi, Trudy Voortman, Bigina Ginos, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Marjo-Riitta Järvelin, Evangelia Tzala, Nina De Toro, Thomas Wright, Barbara Bodinier, Sonia Dagnino, Jayne Evans, Claire Webster, Marjukka Kolehmainen, Kati Hanhineva, Timo Lakka, Otto Savolainen, Iman Zarei, Mari Näätänen, Anton Klåvus, Aino-Maija Eloranta, Juuso Väistö, Anna Kårlund, Santtu Mikkonen, Merja Atalay, Mustafa Atalay, Rikard Landberg, Carl Brunius, Anton Ribbenstedt, Morris Swertz, Eleanor Hyde, Sido Haakma, Esther van Enckevort, Barbara Heude, Marie-Aline Charles, Marie Zins, Johanna Lepeule, Bénédicte Jacquemin, Lucinda Calas, Emeline Lequy-Flahault, Wen Lun Yuan, Emie Seyve, Gabriella Conti, Roel Vermeulen, Gerard Hoek, Jules Kerckhoffs, Inga Prokopenko, Marika Kaakinen, Zhanna Balkhiyarova, Anna Ulrich, Tessa Roseboom, Susanne De Rooij, Irina Motoc, Stine Marie Ulven, Kirsten B. Holven, Jason Matthews, Amanda Rundblad, Siddhartha Das, Nicholas Timpson, Ahmed Elhakeem, Ana Luiza Goncalves Soares, Karim Lekadir, Anna Maria Cascarano, Angélica Maria Atehortua Labrador, Vien Ngoc Dang, Katharina F. Heil, Catherine Gallin, Oliver Díaz, Maria Bulgheroni, Valentina Simonetti, Enrico D’Amico, Laura Giani, Fabrizio Manzino, Stefano Parusso, Christopher Castleton, Diego Moimas, Vincenzo Atella, Andrea Piano Mortari, Joanna Kopinska, Francesca Marazzi, Matilde Giaccherini, Federico Belotti

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 34 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Engineering 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 32 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2022.
All research outputs
#11,638,362
of 33,076,184 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Epidemiology
#211
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,946
of 560,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Epidemiology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,076,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 560,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.