↓ Skip to main content

放射線治療装置(リニアック)導入による採算性に関する考察

Overview of attention for article published in Japan Journal of Medical Informatics, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
放射線治療装置(リニアック)導入による採算性に関する考察
Published in
Japan Journal of Medical Informatics, October 2020
DOI 10.14948/jami.39.73
Authors

村上 淳基, 赤羽 学, 中西 康裕, 今井 信也, 玉本 哲郎, 今村 知明

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japan Journal of Medical Informatics
#12
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,046
of 442,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Journal of Medical Informatics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them