↓ Skip to main content

Transverse Alpine Speciation Driven by Glaciation

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transverse Alpine Speciation Driven by Glaciation
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The allopatric model of biological speciation involves fracturing of a pre-existing species distribution and subsequent genetic divergence in isolation. Accumulating global evidence from the Pyrénées, Andes, Himalaya, and the Southern Alps in New Zealand shows the Pleistocene to be associated with the generation of new alpine lineages. By synthesising a large number of genetic analyses and incorporating tectonic, climatic, and population-genetic models, we show here how glaciation is the likely driver of speciation transverse to the Southern Alps. New calibrations for rates of molecular evolution and tectonic uplift both suggest a ∼2 million-year (Ma) time frame. Although glaciation is often seen as destructive for biodiversity, here we demonstrate its creativity, and suggest a general model for speciation on temperate mountain systems worldwide.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 154 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 23%
Researcher 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Environmental Science 16 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#752,345
of 28,731,329 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#408
of 3,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,336
of 312,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,731,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.