↓ Skip to main content

Attention lapses and behavioural microsleeps during tracking, psychomotor vigilance, and dual tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Consciousness & Cognition, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Attention lapses and behavioural microsleeps during tracking, psychomotor vigilance, and dual tasks
Published in
Consciousness & Cognition, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2016.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examined the incidence of attention lapses and microsleeps under contrasting levels of task complexity during three tasks: PVT, 2-D tracking and a dual task combining the two. More attention lapses per participant (median 15vs. 3; range 1-74vs. 0-76, p=0.001), with the greatest increase with time spent-on-task (p=0.002), were evident on the more cognitively-demanding dual task than on the PVT. Conversely, fewer microsleeps (median 0vs. 0; range 0-1vs. 0-18, p=0.022) occurred during the more complex task compared to the tracking task. An increase in microsleep rate with time spent-on-task (p=0.035) was evident during the tracking task but not the dual task. These results indicate that the higher cognitive load, associated with an increase in task complexity, increased the likelihood of attention lapses, while a reduction in task complexity increased the likelihood of microsleeps.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 30 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 23%
Engineering 14 15%
Neuroscience 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 33 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#31,185,214
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Consciousness & Cognition
#1,767
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,413
of 333,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Consciousness & Cognition
#43
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.