↓ Skip to main content

A spatial model of socioeconomic and environmental determinants of dengue fever in Cali, Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Tropica, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A spatial model of socioeconomic and environmental determinants of dengue fever in Cali, Colombia
Published in
Acta Tropica, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.08.028
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dengue fever has gradually re-emerged across the global South, particularly affecting urban areas of the tropics and sub-tropics. The dynamics of dengue fever transmission are sensitive to changes in environmental conditions, as well as local demographic and socioeconomic factors. In 2010, the municipality of Cali, Colombia, experienced one of its worst outbreaks, however the outbreak was not spatially homogeneous across the city. In this paper, we evaluate the role of socioeconomic and environmental factors associated with this outbreak at the neighborhood level, using a Geographically Weighted Regression model. Key socioeconomic factors include population density and socioeconomic stratum, whereas environmental factors are proximity to both tire shops and plant nurseries and the presence of a sewage system (R(2)=0.64). The strength of the association between these factors and the incidence of dengue fever is spatially heterogeneous at the neighborhood level. The findings provide evidence to support public health strategies in allocating resources locally, which will enable a better detection of high risk areas, a reduction of the risk of infection and to strengthen the resilience of the population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 344 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 110 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Environmental Science 18 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Other 87 25%
Unknown 125 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,396,848
of 27,725,161 outputs
Outputs from Acta Tropica
#355
of 3,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,548
of 315,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Tropica
#7
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,725,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.