↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting ‘A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009’

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Education, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Revisiting ‘A critical review of simulation‐based medical education research: 2003–2009’
Published in
Medical Education, September 2016
DOI 10.1111/medu.12795
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Other 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 36 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#23,167,337
of 32,611,522 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#2,582
of 3,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,236
of 324,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,611,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.