You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
リーダーシップの使用理論はどのように形成・改訂されるのか?―X社に見るリーダーの使用理論の形成・改訂パターンと要因―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japan Journal of Human Resource Management, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.24592/jshrm.22.1_20 |
| Authors |
戸田 信聡 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,192,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Japan Journal of Human Resource Management
#6
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,320
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Journal of Human Resource Management
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.