↓ Skip to main content

Google Internet Searches on Residency Applicants Do Not Facilitate the Ranking Process

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Emergency Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Google Internet Searches on Residency Applicants Do Not Facilitate the Ranking Process
Published in
Journal of Emergency Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nara C. Shin, Edward A. Ramoska, Manish Garg, Adam Rowh, Drew Nyce, Francis DeRoos, Merle Carter, Ronald V. Hall, Bernard L. Lopez, Delaware Valley EM Residency Program Directors Group

Abstract

Information used by program directors (PDs) to evaluate and rank residency applicants is largely limited to the Electronic Residency Application Service and the interview day. The Internet represents a potential source of additional data on applicants. Recent surveys reveal that up to 90% of United States (US) companies are already using the Internet to post jobs and to screen candidates. However, its use in residency applicant evaluation is not well studied.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,151,039
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#832
of 4,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,555
of 341,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Emergency Medicine
#12
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.