↓ Skip to main content

Data-driven methods for dengue prediction and surveillance using real-world and Big Data: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Data-driven methods for dengue prediction and surveillance using real-world and Big Data: A systematic review
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, January 2022
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010056
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 261 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 5%
Student > Bachelor 13 5%
Lecturer 11 4%
Student > Master 10 4%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 162 62%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Computer Science 13 5%
Engineering 11 4%
Unspecified 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 40 15%
Unknown 163 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,782,548
of 31,724,768 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,299
of 10,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,473
of 548,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#36
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,724,768 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 548,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.