↓ Skip to main content

Colonization and diversification of Galpagos terrestrial fauna: a phylogenetic and biogeographical synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Colonization and diversification of Galpagos terrestrial fauna: a phylogenetic and biogeographical synthesis
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2008
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2008.0118
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Remote oceanic islands have long been recognized as natural models for the study of evolutionary processes involved in diversification. Their remoteness provides opportunities for isolation and divergence of populations, which make islands remarkable settings for the study of diversification. Groups of islands may share a relatively similar geological history and comparable climate, but their inhabitants experience subtly different environments and have distinct evolutionary histories, offering the potential for comparative studies. A range of organisms have colonized the Galápagos Islands, and various lineages have radiated throughout the archipelago to form unique assemblages. This review pays particular attention to molecular phylogenetic studies of Galápagos terrestrial fauna. We find that most of the Galápagos terrestrial fauna have diversified in parallel to the geological formation of the islands. Lineages have occasionally diversified within islands, and the clearest cases occur in taxa with very low vagility and on large islands with diverse habitats. Ecology and habitat specialization appear to be critical in speciation both within and between islands. Although the number of phylogenetic studies is continuously increasing, studies of natural history, ecology, evolution and behaviour are essential to completely reveal how diversification proceeded on these islands.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Brazil 7 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 331 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 18%
Student > Bachelor 63 17%
Student > Master 36 10%
Professor 20 5%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 47 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 226 62%
Environmental Science 33 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 53 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,479,854
of 32,023,687 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1,953
of 7,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,953
of 124,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#13
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,023,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.