↓ Skip to main content

A spreadsheet calculator for estimating biogas production and economic measures for UK-based farm-fed anaerobic digesters

Overview of attention for article published in Bioresource Technology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A spreadsheet calculator for estimating biogas production and economic measures for UK-based farm-fed anaerobic digesters
Published in
Bioresource Technology, August 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.103
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This paper presents a spreadsheet calculator to estimate biogas production and the operational revenue and costs for UK-based farm-fed anaerobic digesters. There exist sophisticated biogas production models in published literature, but the application of these in farm-fed anaerobic digesters is often impractical. This is due to the limited measuring devices, financial constraints, and the operators being non-experts in anaerobic digestion. The proposed biogas production model is designed to use the measured process variables typically available at farm-fed digesters, accounting for the effects of retention time, temperature and imperfect mixing. The estimation of the operational revenue and costs allow the owners to assess the most profitable approach to run the process. This would support the sustained use of the technology. The calculator is first compared with literature reported data, and then applied to the digester unit on a UK Farm to demonstrate its use in a practical setting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Lecturer 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 37 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 20%
Environmental Science 13 10%
Energy 11 9%
Chemical Engineering 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 46 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,401,034
of 29,473,327 outputs
Outputs from Bioresource Technology
#5,300
of 9,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,508
of 318,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresource Technology
#46
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,473,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.