↓ Skip to main content

The Effects of Amplitude Normalization and EMG Targets on cVEMP Interaural Amplitude Asymmetry

Overview of attention for article published in Ear and hearing (Print), July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Effects of Amplitude Normalization and EMG Targets on cVEMP Interaural Amplitude Asymmetry
Published in
Ear and hearing (Print), July 2013
DOI 10.1097/aud.0b013e31827ad792
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether the use of visual feedback of tonic electromyographic (EMG) activity, or the use of amplitude normalization techniques would reduce significantly the variability in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) P13-N23 interaural amplitude asymmetry data in otologically and neurologically intact children and adults.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2013.
All research outputs
#28,603,920
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#1,738
of 2,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,314
of 240,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.