↓ Skip to main content

A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
4 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
6 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A three-dimensional biomechanical analysis of the squat during varying stance widths
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, June 2001
DOI 10.1097/00005768-200106000-00019
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify biomechanical parameters employing two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) analyses while performing the squat with varying stance widths.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 7 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 496 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 99 19%
Student > Bachelor 91 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 9%
Student > Postgraduate 34 7%
Other 23 4%
Other 92 18%
Unknown 131 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 205 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 9%
Engineering 36 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Other 38 7%
Unknown 143 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2026.
All research outputs
#1,068,413
of 34,601,984 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#925
of 8,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#701
of 62,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#7
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.