↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Synthesis, Identification, and Structure Elucidation of Adducts Formed by Reactions of Hydroxycinnamic Acids with Glutathione or Cysteinylglycine
Published in
Journal of Natural Products, September 2016
DOI 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00279
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Grape polyphenols, especially hydroxycinnamic acids such as caftaric and caffeic acid, are prone to enzymatic oxidation reactions during the winemaking process, forming o-quinones and leading to color darkening. Glutathione is capable of trapping these o-quinones and thus limiting juice browning. In this study, the addition of glutathione or cysteinylglycine onto caftaric or caffeic acid o-quinones formed by polyphenoloxidase-catalyzed reactions was investigated by UPLC-DAD-ESIMS and NMR data analyses. Complete identification of adducts has been achieved via NMR data. The results confirmed that the favored reaction is the substitution of the sulfanyl group of cysteine at C-2 of the aromatic ring. Several minor isomers, namely, the cis-isomer of the 2-S adduct and trans-isomers of the 5-S and 6-S adducts, and the 2,5-di-S-glutathionyl adducts were also identified and quantified by qNMR. With the exception of 2-(S-glutathionyl)- and 2,5-di(S-glutathionyl)-trans-caftaric acid, these products had never been formally identified. In particular, the 5-S and 6-S derivatives are reported here for the first time. The first formal identification of 2-S cis-derivatives is also provided. Moreover, NMR and UPLC-DAD-ESIMS analysis showed that signature UV and MS spectra can serve as markers of the conformation and substitution position in the aromatic ring for each of the isomers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 23%
Chemistry 6 23%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,384,302
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Products
#3,931
of 4,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,661
of 322,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Products
#23
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.