↓ Skip to main content

Type M: A Structure for Absorbing Students in Learning: Seen from the Approach of Conversation Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Type M: A Structure for Absorbing Students in Learning: Seen from the Approach of Conversation Analysis
Published in
Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu, January 2006
DOI 10.11151/eds1951.78.147
Authors

Hideki OHTSUJI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,859,894
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#81
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,071
of 175,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kyoiku-shakaigaku Kenkyu
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.