↓ Skip to main content

我が国におけるオートショックAEDの導入と課題

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Reanimatology, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
我が国におけるオートショックAEDの導入と課題
Published in
Japanese Journal of Reanimatology, April 2022
DOI 10.11414/jjreanimatology.41.1_1
Authors

丸川 征四郎, 金子 洋, 畑中 哲生, 長瀬 亜岐, 坂本 哲也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Reanimatology
#5
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,821
of 447,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Reanimatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them