↓ Skip to main content

Map showing landslides in California that have caused fatalities or at least $1,000,000 in damages from 1906 to 1984

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Map showing landslides in California that have caused fatalities or at least $1,000,000 in damages from 1906 to 1984
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 1986
DOI 10.3133/mf1867
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#5,760,844
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#428
of 2,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,816
of 42,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.